Holsatia Shipping Corp. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANNELLA, District Judge:
After a nonjury trial on the merits of plaintiff’s complaint, the Court finds for plaintiff. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is referred to Magistrate Washington for a determination of the accuracy of the general average adjustments.
FACTS
This is an admiralty and maritime claim for contribution in general average over which the Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1333 and Fed. R.Civ.P. 9(h). The defendant cargo insurers refuse to pay the general average assessment on the ground that plaintiff failed to exercise…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The JasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- CIA. Atlantica Pacifica, S. A. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1967
- Orient Mid-East Lines, Inc. v. Shipment of RiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Peter Paul, Inc., Libellants-Appellants v. Rederi A/b Pulp, Claimant-Respondent-Cross Libellant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Bubble Up International Ltd. v. Transpacific Carriers Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.