Legal Opinion

Yesel v. Brandon

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2015No. 20140186, 20140187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Phyllis Yesel and Gloria Van Dyke (“Yesel”) appeal from a summary judgment concluding the abandoned mineral statutes do not apply to royalty interests, and alternatively, if the statutes apply to royalty interests, the royalty interests at issue here were not abandoned. Christian Teigen cross-appeals from a judgment denying his motion to file a counterclaim and motion for attorneys’ fees. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand, concluding the mineral interests related to the royalty interests at issue in this case were used, and the district court misapplied the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Security National Bank, Edgeley v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Acoma Oil Corp. v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Rickert v. Dakota Sanitation Plus, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Perfect Plastics Industries, Inc. v. Cars & Concepts, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. ErwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. N.P. v. M.E.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  4. SunBehm Gas, Inc. v. Equinor Energy, LPDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API