McCauley v. Chapman

KING, Judge.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the trial court was correct in finding that defendant had proved its reconventional demand of redhibition, in rescinding the sale, and in ordering the plaintiff to pay attorney’s fees and court costs.

Ronald McCauley, d/b/a McCauley’s Gifts and Interiors (hereinafter plaintiff) filed suit on open account against Dallas and Lou Chapman (hereinafter defendants) to recover for the cost of merchandise and services sold on open account. Defendants reconvened to set aside the sale, on the basis of redhibitory defects in the…