Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Pastime Amusement Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided March 31, 1965No. Civ. A. Nos. 6481, 6482PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, Chief Judge.
Motion in this private anti-trust action by defendant Pastime Amusement Company pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.Rules Civ. Pro. for an Order:
“requiring the', plaintiff to produce for inspection and copying any, and all releases, covenants not to sue, agreements, contracts, letters, telegrams, correspondence and memor-anda, and any and all other documents and written instruments of whatsoever kind or nature leading up to, related to, or in any wise connected with the dismissal from this action of the defendants, Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Loew’s Incorporated,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McWhirter v. Otis Elevator Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1941
- Chitty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1964
- Dura Electric Lamp Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Massey v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Compton v. Mustang Engineering Ltd. (In re MPF Holding U.S. LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2013