Legal Opinion

Scurlock Oil Company v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 6, 1963No. 7495PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is an action for damage to land caused by negligent failure to prevent crude petroleum from leaking out of a pipeline. A judgment awarding plaintiff $2,400.00 costs, etc., is affirmed.

In conformity with the plaintiff’s pleadings the trial court submitted special issues to determine the fact of alleged negligent omissions of the pipeline operator, which issue the jury answered in the affirmative and found the omissions to be the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damage. These issues are quoted, to-wit:

(No. 2). “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cartwright v. CanodeTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Brown v. LundellTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. General Crude Oil Company v. AikenTexas Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Socony Mobil Co., Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Moran Corporation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Badgett v. ErspanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Sohio Pipeline Co. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API