Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1912No. 22,019PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Pike Circuit Court; John L. Brets, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Albert Gilmore. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellant, a druggist, was tried and convicted of the offense of selling one quart of whisky, in violation of law. The only errors assigned call in question the action of the court in overruling (1) “the motion to quash each count of the indictment, and (2) the motion for a new trial. ’ ’

1. When a motion to quash an indictment is overruled by a court in this State, it is settled that unless said motion states one or more of the grounds for quashing an indietment specified in §2065 Burns 1908, Acts 1905 p. 584, no question as to the correctness of such ruling of the court can be presented on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Volker v. State ex rel. CreamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hawks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Underhill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jenkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Volker v. State ex rel. CreamerIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Ward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API