Legal Opinion
Fieland v. Fieland
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated May 17, 1995, as granted that branch of the plaintiff husband’s motion which was for pendente lite maintenance in the sum of $350 per month.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Although the Supreme Court was not obligated to consider the specific factors enumerated in Domestic Relations Law § 236 (B) (6) in determining the husband’s application for pendente lite relief, the court should have set forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Byer v. ByerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- LoMuscio-Hamparian v. HamparianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Forsberg v. ForsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ferdinand v. FerdinandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albanese v. AlbaneseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Pascazi v. PascaziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Barone v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Jin C. v. Juliana L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016