Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hill v. Joseffy

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1953No. 12532Published

1Dissent

NORVELL, Justice.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion which holds that the effect of the birth of the two children after the execution of the will by Rafael Joseffy was to revoke the will in toto, subject only to the contingency that the will would become effective if the children should die before reaching the age of twenty-one years. The Supreme Court has determined that the purpose of Article 8293 is to protect the rights of children born after a will is executed. This objective is attained by regarding the will as ineffective to destroy the rights such children have under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  2. Chase v. American Cartage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Thomas v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Conroy v. ConroyTexas Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API