Legal Opinion

Burton v. . W. W. R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the former hearing, this case was carefully examined and considered, and after being retained under an advisari, decided, and our conclusion announced at the succeeding term (82 N.C. 504). To the full and elaborate argument now addressed to us on behalf of the plaintiff for a revision of the opinion then formed, we have given the attention due to the importance of the case and the principle involved, and now proceed to announce the result.

Two errors are assigned in the application for a re hearing [rehearing]

1. No exception having been taken to the charge in the particular declared to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. State v. . CavenessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Holmes v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Williamson v. Look's Creek Canal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. State v. . AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gregg v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. State v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Lindley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Roberts v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Jones v. Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API