Legal Opinion

Cucuzza v. Campbell

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1930No. 122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

On December 16, 1927, the Prohibition Administrator issued an order to show cause in revocation proceedings, returnable at his office January 5, 1927, why appellee’s permit should not be revoked because the appellee had diverted specially denatured alcohol, kept false records, and presented to the agents fals.e bills purporting to show purchases of essential oils. This was based principally upon the faet that bills of C. S. Iáttell & Co., Inc., for essential oils sold to the appellee were false bills, and that they did not sell any of the essential oils referred to in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donnelley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Smokador Mfg. Co. v. Tubular Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Pennington v. WalterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
  2. Meinwald v. DoranDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  3. Frank J. Smith & Son v. McCampbellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API