Mesker v. Cutler
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circ%iit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Eisheb, Judge. (1) The motion for new trial does not appear by the bill of exceptions to have been filed in time-. State ex rel. v. Gaither, 77 Mo. 304; Dempskev. Hunter, 23 Mo. App. 466; State to use v. Mason, 31 Mo. App. 211. (2) The lien account was sufficient. DeWittv. Smith, 63 Mo. 263; Gibson v. Nagel, 15 Mo. App. 597; Brims v. Braun, 35 Mo. App. 337; Hayden v. Wulfing, 19 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circ%iit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Eisheb, Judge. (1) The motion for new trial does not appear by the bill of exceptions to have been filed in time-. State ex rel. v. Gaither, 77 Mo. 304; Dempskev. Hunter, 23 Mo. App. 466; State to use v. Mason, 31 Mo. App. 211. (2) The lien account was sufficient. DeWittv. Smith, 63 Mo. 263; Gibson v. Nagel, 15 Mo. App. 597; Brims v. Braun, 35 Mo. App. 337; Hayden v. Wulfing, 19 Mo. App. 353; McLaughlin v. Schawacker, 31 Mo. App. 365; McDermott v. Claas, 104 Mo. 14; Peck v. Brichoell, 10 Mo. App. 524; Brooks v. Blackwell, 76 Mo.…
1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.
The defendant Spier contracted with the defendant Cutler for work to be done by the latter in repairing the ceilings of a certain store building. Cutler employed the plaintiffs to furnish corrugated iron for that purpose and put it in place. He failed to pay the plaintiffs for their work, and they filed a lien account against the buildings, and in the present action seeks to recover a judgment against the contractor, and foreclose their lien against the building. The cause was tried by a jury, who found for the plaintiffs on both issues. The appellant assigns for error that the verdict is not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coe v. RitterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- McDermott v. ClaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Hayden v. WulfingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- State ex rel. Estes v. GaitherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Demske v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hill v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mitchell Planing Mill Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Kneisley Lumber Co. v. Edward B. Stoddard Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Estate of Pound v. CassityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902