Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Teeter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1985PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

In this personal injury action the Court of Appeals reversed a jury verdict for the defendants, appellants here, because of error in the jury instructions. After review of the record and of the instructions given, we concur in the result reached by the Court of Appeals and remand the cause for a new trial.

Because the case is to be re-tried, a detailed statement of the evidence is not necessary. There were discrepancies in the testimony of the parties and witnesses, presenting a proper case for jury determination. The issues were close, so that correct jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  2. Hudson v. GaitanTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  4. Boyd v. BoydTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Greg Parker v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, IncorporatedTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Blair v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Skelton v. Twin County Rural Elec. Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Loeffler v. KjellgrenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API