Legal Opinion

United States v. R.A. Corbett Transport, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided May 11, 1990No. M-89-165-CAPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HA.LL, District Judge.

Came on for consideration Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition. Having examined all materials properly before it, the Court is of the opinion that said Motion for Summary Judgment should be DENIED.

This cause of action is brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERC-LA), 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a) for recovery of response costs incurred by the United States due to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the Stewco, Inc. Site near Waskom, Harrison County, Texas.…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kelley v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. California Ex Rel. California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Hyampom Lumber Co.District Court, E.D. California · 1995
  3. United States v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  4. United States v. Petersen Sand and Gravel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  5. United States v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API