Salt Lake City v. Smoot
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GREENWOOD, Judge:
Defendant Donald Phillip Smoot appeals his jury conviction on one count of Interfering with an Officer, a violation of Salt Lake City Code § 11.04.030 (1989). Defendant argues that the police had no right to run a warrants cheek on him and that the jury was improperly instructed. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
In January of 1994, a series of armed robberies occurred at several downtown bars and restaurants in Salt Lake City. Defendant testified that he had become concerned about these robberies because he was a resident of the area and had friends who worked in nearby bars and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PatefieldCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- State v. AlonzoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997
- State v. HansenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- State v. DevanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
- State v. MogenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.