Legal Opinion

People v. Acosta

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 12, 2014No. G049326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

Under Penal Code section 502.5, a borrower under a loan secured by real estate may not intentionally harm the lender by removing statutorily specified improvements from the encumbered premises. Section 502.5 was amended to read in its present form some 91 years ago. Despite the age of the statute, we have not found a single appellate opinion, published or unpublished, in which an appellate court has reviewed a conviction under the statute. It appears we have been tasked with being the first to do so.

A jury convicted defendants Robert Conrad Acosta and Monique Evette Acosta of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (HC) Hernandez v. BaughmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. People v. Crespo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. Garner CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. Rizzardi CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. SeoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API