Legal Opinion
Moore v. Denbury Onshore, LLC
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided February 1, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14CV913PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
ROBERT G. JAMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This is an oilfield remediation case. Plaintiffs Martha Zoe Moore, Charles Dane Moore, and Melissa Moore Hutchinson (“the Moores”) filed suit against Den-bury Onshore, LLC (“Denbury”) for con*715taminating their property through oil and gas operations. Because this suit involves environmental damage arising from oil and gas activities, La. Rev. Stat. § 30:29 (“Act 312”) applies.
The Moores seek, among other things, remediation of their property to its original condition. Denbury has filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 31] moving…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stout Conrad L L C v. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore L PDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024