Lancaster v. State

Barnes, Judge.

Following a bench trial on stipulated facts, Dustin Blake Lancaster appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. In three enumerations of error, Lancaster argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized during a traffic stop. For the following reasons, we reject Lancaster’s arguments and affirm.

When reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, this court’s responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision. The evidence is construed…