Legal Opinion

Brannon v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1934No. 4 Div. 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was charged with, and convicted of, grand larceny. The indictment, framed under Code, § 4905, described the stolen property as “a heifer, an animal of the cow kind,” and “a bull yearling, an animal of the cow kind.” The evidence, without dispute, showed the asportation of a heifer and a steer yearling.

Contending that there was a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof, appellant requested the affirmative charge and special charges to the effect that if the jury believed from the evidence that the male cow-involved was a steer yearling they could not convict…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marsh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1864
  3. Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Ribghy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API