Brannon v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge.
Appellant was charged with, and convicted of, grand larceny. The indictment, framed under Code, § 4905, described the stolen property as “a heifer, an animal of the cow kind,” and “a bull yearling, an animal of the cow kind.” The evidence, without dispute, showed the asportation of a heifer and a steer yearling.
Contending that there was a fatal variance between the indictment and the proof, appellant requested the affirmative charge and special charges to the effect that if the jury believed from the evidence that the male cow-involved was a steer yearling they could not convict…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marsh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1864
- Mobley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Ribghy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958