Legal Opinion

Dillingham v. Scott

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1909Published

Error to Circuit Court, Elrst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

BALLOU, J.

This case, brought up hv defendant’s writ of error, is an action of assumpsit to recover the sum of $1100 which the plaintiff as maker of an accommodation note was obliged to pay at ihe maturity thereof and which he seeks to recover from the defendant as the accommodated party. The circumstances of the execution of the note as shown by the evidence are as follows:

The Kona Sugar Co., Ltd., a plantation corporation, had become financially embarrassed and at the suit of some of its *422creditors brought in the first circuit, had been placed in the hands of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mansfield v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  2. Altman v. AntonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Lockwood v. TwitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Gillespie v. CampbellU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API