Legal Opinion

Phoenix-Jellico Coal Co. v. Grant

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 20, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

— Affirming.

*96This is an action by appellee upon a supersedeas bond. In August, 1905, appellant leased to Grant several hundred acres of undeveloped coal lands in Laurel county for a term of four years and nine months, under a contract which bound appellant to furnish Grant with mine ears, tracks, tip-house, and timber for mining purposes, and for which Grant was to pay. By an amended supplementary contract of June 1, 1906, Grant admitted an indebtedness to appellant of $2,239.22, which he agreed to pay in monthly installments of $100.00, and in case of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. LinnemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Phoenix Jellico Coal Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Madisonville v. NisbitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Barnes v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API