Legal Opinion

Ragland v. General Tire and Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1989No. 88-99PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellant, Charles D. Ragland (Commissioner), challenges the trial court’s determination that the appellee, General Tire and Rubber Company, Inc. (General Tire), is exempt under Ark. Code Ann. § 26-52-401(12)(A) and (B) (Supp. 1987) from paying use tax on chemicals used in the manufacturing of tennis balls and rubber moldings. We hold that the trial court erred in its ruling. Therefore, we reverse the judgment entered in favor of General Tire and remand the case for further proceedings.

The Commissioner conducted a use tax audit of General Tire’s records for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heath v. Westark Poultry Processing Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Wilson & Co., Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Hervey v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. C.J.C. Co. v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. Qualls v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pledger v. C.B. Form Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. City of Little Rock v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Pledger v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Pledger v. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Pulaski County v. Jacuzzi Bros. DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API