Legal Opinion

McArdle v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1908No. Gen. No. 13,734Published

Action in case. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; • the Hon. Charles M. Walkeb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brown

In our opinion the defense which the defendant company interposes by its argument in this appeal to the allegations of the plaintiff’s declaration, was not properly raised by the demurrer to said declaration.

The defense is that the plaintiff cannot recover damages against the defendant corporation as for a nuisance for actions which in a private individual would constitute a nuisance and be actionable, because the actions complained of are performed under a legislative sanction—under indeed a grant of power from the legislature to do these very things.

We think this is a substantive defense,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Doane v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Chicago General Railway Co. v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Chicago North Shore St. Ry. Co. v. PayneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API