MATTER OF WEIN v. Molinari
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Messrs. Molinari, Thompson, Hart and Petrides filed objections to appellant’s nominating petition which were upheld by the Board of Elections. In his subsequent special proceeding to validate his petition, appellant named and served only Molinari and Thompson. Accordingly his proceeding was fatally defective for failure to. name and serve Messrs. Hart and Petrides (Matter of Cappellazzi v Toto, 41 NY2d 1050).
It is irrelevant that Hart had not joined in the counterpart proceeding to invalidate…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Hutson v. BassNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Matter of Gadsen v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Dioguardi v. DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Giorgi v. Monroe County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Matter of Davis v. CzarnyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.