Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marre v. Reed

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1989No. 71235Published

1DissentHiggins, Judge

With due respect for the principal opinion, I find myself in dissent. I would reverse the judgment of the trial court because the sole ground for the new election there ordered is voter qualification, a matter not subject to collateral attack in an election contest proceeding under section 115.553.1, RSMo 1986. Whitener v. Turnbeau, 602 S.W.2d 890 (Mo.App.1980); Gasconade R-III School Dist. v. Williams, 641 S.W.2d 444 (Mo.App.1982).

In this opinion, I draw freely from the opinion of the Honorable Kent E. Karohl for the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.

The trial court found 11 voters…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. State Ex Rel. Howard Electric Cooperative v. RineySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Wells v. NoldonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Whitener v. TurnbeauMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Gasconade R-III School District v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API