Legal Opinion

Minster v. Citizens' Railway Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the St. Charles Circuit Court. — Hon. W; W. Edwards, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

— The street railway of the defendant, and also that of the St. Louis Cable & Western railway, are cable roads, and they cross each other at the junction of Easton and Franklin avenues. The plaintiff was a conductor on the St. Louis Cable & Western railway, and he received personal. injuries by reason of the grip car of his train running against the slot of the St. Louis Cable & Western Railway Company at the crossing of the two roads. The plaintiff claims that the slot of the St. Louis Cable & Western Railway Company was displaced by the negligence of the defendant’s servants, who were at-…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barrett v. . the Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Dyer v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Colegrove v. New York & New Haven RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  5. Chapman v. . New Haven Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Abbitt v. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Grace v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Fleddermann v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. McCarty v. St. Louis & Suburban Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Brown v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API