Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. O'neill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1906No. Docket No. 55PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from St. Clair; Tappan, J. Petition by James B. Bradley, auditor general, against John G. O’Neill, executor of the last will and testament of Peter J. O’Neill, deceased, and others, for the sale of land delinquent for taxes. Prom a decree for contestants, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The appellees contested a tax sought to

*344be enforced against them by the auditor general. They owned separate parcels of land, but their several contests, being similar, have been combined for hearing in this case. Their contest arises over a sewer assessment, and it was sustained by the circuit court, and the prayer of the bill was denied as to these items. Black river flows in a southeasterly direction. River street is north of the river, with which it runs parallel, separated from it by one tier of lots. Huron avenue runs north and south intersecting River street, and extending to the river…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GainMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Walker v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Fort Myers v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. City of Fort Myers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Auditor General v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lawrence v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Finlayson, Et Vir v. Town of MonticelloSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API