Legal Opinion

Lane v. Associated Housing Developers

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 2, 1988PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWFORD, Judge.

This is a suit for specific performance or in the alternative damages for breach of two real estate sales contracts between plaintiffs, Daniel M. Lane, Walter Ham-mert and Samuel Patterson (hereinafter Sellers), and defendant, Associated Housing Developers, a Tennessee limited partnership (hereinafter Buyer). Buyer filed a counter-complaint for a refund of the earnest money. The chancellor denied recovery to either party and Sellers have appealed, presenting three issues for review which we quote from their brief:

1. Whether the trial court erred in finding no breach of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Inman v. Union Planters National BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. Turner v. BensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Shuptrine v. QuinnTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brister v. Estate of BrubakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1960
  5. Machine Co. v. Compress Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. BancorpSouth Bank, Inc. v. HatchelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Bancorpsouth Bank, Inc. v. Billy J. HatchelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  3. Ben Wilson v. Kate Wilson WardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Dan Hampton v. Macon County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. Donald L. Mott, Murl Kennamore, and K & M. Petroleum Corp. v. D. Dean Graves and Security Title Insurance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API