Legal Opinion

State v. Sims

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Caldwell. Tried below before the Hon. John P. White.

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

The indictment omitted the conclusion required by the constitution, to wit, “ against the peace and dignity of the State.” It was excepted to, and ivas set aside by the court, but not on that ground. That is not one of the exceptions to matters of substance specified in the Code of Criminal Procedure. In the case of The State v. Durst it is said, “the courts have no authority to dispense with that which the constitution *522requires” in sustaining an exception of this kind made to an indictment. (7 Tex., 74.) It has been held to be a fatal defect, whether specially excepted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PembertonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. State v. DurstTexas Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Hardin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1880
  5. Holden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1876

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API