People v. Kincaid
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Craven
Although the record might support the finding that the defendant’s confession was the product of a rational intellect, the record does not support a finding that the defendant’s confession was a product of a free will. There is no question that the defendant’s will was overborne, and therefore the defendant’s confession was involuntary. The confession does not become voluntary merely because it was reliable. (See Townsend v. Sain (1963), 372 U.S. 293, 9 L. Ed. 2d 770, 83 S. Ct. 745.) The trial court’s finding that the defendant’s confession was voluntary was erroneous, and, therefore, I must…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Reck v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. McKinnieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979