Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Kincaid

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 25, 1980No. 15891Published

1DissentJustice Craven

Although the record might support the finding that the defendant’s confession was the product of a rational intellect, the record does not support a finding that the defendant’s confession was a product of a free will. There is no question that the defendant’s will was overborne, and therefore the defendant’s confession was involuntary. The confession does not become voluntary merely because it was reliable. (See Townsend v. Sain (1963), 372 U.S. 293, 9 L. Ed. 2d 770, 83 S. Ct. 745.) The trial court’s finding that the defendant’s confession was voluntary was erroneous, and, therefore, I must…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Reck v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. People v. McKinnieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API