Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mickle v. Blackmon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1969No. 18869Published

1DissentLewis, Justice

(dissenting) :

While I agree that the judgment against Cherokee should be affirmed and that the judgment entered in Ford’s favor notwithstanding the verdict should be reversed, I do not agree that a new trial should be ordered. To that extent, I dissent from the main opinion. The verdict of the jury against both Cherokee and Ford should be sustained.

The main opinion, following general negligence principles, soundly holds that a “manufacturer is under a duty to use reasonable care in the design of its vehicle to avoid subjecting the user to an unreasonable risk of injury in the event of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glasgow v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Matthews v. Payne, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  4. Prisock v. International Agricultural Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API