Mickle v. Blackmon
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentLewis, Justice
(dissenting) :
While I agree that the judgment against Cherokee should be affirmed and that the judgment entered in Ford’s favor notwithstanding the verdict should be reversed, I do not agree that a new trial should be ordered. To that extent, I dissent from the main opinion. The verdict of the jury against both Cherokee and Ford should be sustained.
The main opinion, following general negligence principles, soundly holds that a “manufacturer is under a duty to use reasonable care in the design of its vehicle to avoid subjecting the user to an unreasonable risk of injury in the event of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glasgow v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
- Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Matthews v. Payne, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Prisock v. International Agricultural Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928