Legal Opinion

State v. Workman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Christian Circuit Court. — Hon. James T. Neville, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Biggs, J. —

The defendant was indicted, tried and convictod of a violation of the dramshop law. He has appealed and insists that under the law and evidence he is entitled to his discharge.

evidence. The state introduced evidence tending to prove that on the first day of February, 1897, the defendant sold to the prosecuting witness intoxicating liquors in less quantity than three gallons. The evidence relied on by the defendant tended to show that at the time of the sale the defendant was the part owner of a stock of drugs, but was not himself a pharmacist; that Dr. B. W. Henslee was his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. GoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. O'KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. State v. BackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. State v. O'KelleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API