Legal Opinion

Binkley's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1927No. Appeal 284, 285, 286, 287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

We are in no doubt about the meaning of this will, read in the light of the familiar rule that the intention of the testator must be ascertained by considering the will as a whole: Hollinshead’s Estate, 273 Pa. 573, 576. He died without issue, survived by a widow. He also left a number of brothers and sisters and a niece, Alice Binkley, who was the daughter of a deceased brother.

Testator was a physician. His will and codicil apparently drawn with care, cover a number of printed pages. In the earlier paragraphs he gives various legacies, in some cases all payable at once, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of RootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Green's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Hollinshead's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wittmer EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Estate of Sarah R. LambertonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Binger v. AckermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API