Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Lee

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1981No. 16566Published

1DissentMaughan, Chief Justice

For the following reasons, I dissent.

The majority, in my opinion, has circumvented the defendant’s legitimate right to the protection provided by the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 14, of the Utah Constitution by relying on antiquated analysis and the inappropriate application of a procedural technicality.

Reasoning that the officer’s observation of the interior of the camper, with the aid of a flashlight, was from a position not protected by the prohibition against unlawful searches and seizures the majority concludes the Sergeant’s inspection of the camper did not constitute a…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API