Legal Opinion

Ciaramitaro v. State Farm Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1981No. Docket 52449PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff sued to recover survivor’s loss benefits for her husband’s death from his no-fault insurance carrier. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1), and plaintiff appeals.

On January 26, 1979, plaintiff’s decedent was in the process of conducting his normal door-to-door produce business from his truck when he was confronted by an unknown armed assailant who robbed and killed him. Plaintiff’s claim for benefits from defendant was denied.

This case involves the question of whether the death of plaintiff’s decedent arose out of the ownership,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Partrich v. MuscatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. HigginbothamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. O'Key v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hamka v. Automobile ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bromley v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Wright v. WrightMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. A & G Associates, Inc. v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Shaw v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API