Legal Opinion

People v. Pender

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered July 15, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor’s comments on summation constituted reversible error is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]), and, in any event, is without merit. The prosecutor’s remarks were fair comment on the evidence and fair responses to the defense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. RussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LouisiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. GloverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. People v. AdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API