Legal Opinion
State v. Harbor City Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1992No. CX-91-1619Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The state challenges the admissibility of evidence that the nonconforming use status of a condemned property increased its fair market value. We affirm.
FACTS
The State of Minnesota condemned the property on which Harbor City Oil operated a bulk heating oil storage and distribution center. Situated on the property were a number of above ground oil storage tanks that were a legal but nonconforming use under the existing zoning ordinance. Because of the current zoning regulations, Harbor City was unable to find another site of operation within East Duluth, but eventually…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- County of Ramsey v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Gebrian v. Bristol Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- City of Minneapolis v. SchuttSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- City of Elko v. ZillichNevada Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.