Legal Opinion

McClure v. United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 10, 2016No. Case No. 1:14-CV-845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION REGARDING CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GORDON J. QUIST, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Jason McClure, has sued Defendants, the United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan (the UPS Plan) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. In particular, McClure requests that the Court declare that State Farm — his automobile insurer — is primarily liable for payment of the medical expenses that McClure incurred as a result of a 2011…

2Cases cited14 opinions

U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchenSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
Champion v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
Gosselink v. American Telephone & Telegraph, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
Auto Owners Insurance Company, a Michigan Insurance Corporation v. Thorn Apple Valley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Bartalino v. Citizens Insurance Company of the MidwestDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021