Legal Opinion

Cullinan v. Hare

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1944No. 2452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

George W. Hare instituted this suit against Frank Cullinan and the American Republics Corporation for damages resulting from alleged injuries to his person and to his automobile by reason of a highway collision alleged to be due to the negligent operation by Cullinan of the other car owned by his employer, his co-defendant. In their answer the defendants urged many special exceptions, general and special denials. A trial before the court and jury resulted in a verdict and judgment convicting defendants of negligence on three different grounds, and they appeal.

The errors…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. EctorTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Texas Cities Gas Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. City of Dallas v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WorthyTexas Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  2. Sam v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Truitt v. Shamrock HotelDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API