Legal Opinion

Woolley v. Woolley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 7, 2010No. 01-10-07PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Steven Woolley, appeals the February 24, 2010 judgment of the Shelby County Court of Common Pleas finding that appellee, Scott Woolley, was granted a devise of a fee simple subject to a condition subsequent in a certain parcel of real estate.

{¶ 2} The parties stipulated to the following facts. Alfred B. Woolley (also known as “Sam”) owned real estate located at 105 East Russell Road in Sidney, Ohio. Alfred had two sons, Wayne Woolley and appellant, Steven Woolley. Appellee, Scott Woolley, is Wayne’s son. Scott is also Alfred’s grandson and Steven’s nephew.

{¶ 3}…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Domo v. McCarthyOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Oliver v. Bank One, Dayton, N.A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Dunkel v. HilyardOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. McCulloch v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Estate of GaskillOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. In re Estate of StockmasterOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Ashenhurst v. Ohio State Elections Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API