Legal Opinion
Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided January 26, 1989No. 09-88-029 CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
763 S.W.2d 561 (1988)
Mertice Marie PECORINO, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Pecorino, Deceased Appellant,
v.
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Appellees.
No. 09-88-029 CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.
December 29, 1988.
Concurring Opinion January 26, 1989.
Rehearing Denied January 26, 1989.
Greg Thompson, Port Arthur, for appellant.
O.J. Weber, Sandra Clark, Beaumont, Elizabeth Thompson, Thomas W. Taylor, Houston, for appellees.
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
Summary judgment appeal.
This appeal is taken from a summary judgment proceeding. A summary judgment was…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Otis Elevator Company v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Albert E. Albertson v. T.J. Stevenson & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.