Legal Opinion

Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp. v. Seebeck

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 24, 1981No. 80-597PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

Appellant filed an action against appellee claiming damages by virtue of the breach of an equipment lease. Appellee’s answer admitted the execution of the lease, but denied the breach. Appellee also affirmatively pleaded (a) termination by mutual consent; (b) release; (c) waiver; and (d) lach-es. Appellant filed no reply to the affirmative defenses, and noticed the case for trial.

On the day set for trial, appellee moved ore tenus for a judgment on the pleadings and the subsequent orders entered by the court granting the motion make it appear that the motion was granted because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore Meats, Inc. v. Strawn, in & for Seminole Cty.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Equibank, N.A. v. PenlandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Miller v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. IrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Roman v. BogleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. U.S. Bank v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. WATERFALL VICTORIA GRANTOR TRUST II, SERIES G v. SARAH MCDONALDDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API