Legal Opinion
In re Rachel H.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 31, 2009PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1061In four related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), dated February 27, 2008, which, after a hearing, found that she neglected Rachel H. and derivatively neglected Sarah H., Frieda H., and David H.
Ordered that the fact-finding order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A finding of neglect must be supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). Further, a single incident of excessive corporal punishment may suffice to sustain a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re Daniella HH.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re Aaliyah Q.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Erich J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Samuel Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Delehia J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re James S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Tarelle J. (Walter J.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re Charlie S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Corey Mc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.