Legal Opinion

Rushford v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the petition seeking to compel respondent to comply with petitioner’s request for information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law art 6). An agency must provide a "particularized and specific justification for denying access” (Matter of Capital Newspapers v Bums, 67 NY2d 562, 566; see, Matter of Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, 251; Brown v Town of Amherst, 195 AD2d 979, 979-980) and is required to support its claim of exemption from disclosure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Capital Newspapers Division of the Hearst Corp. v. BurnsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Konigsberg v. CoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Gannett Co. v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Buffalo News v. Buffalo Municipal Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Gannett Co. v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DeCorse v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API