Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Sanford

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1944No. 11039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant sought discharge from the penitentiary by writ of habeas corpus because the sentence under which he is held is for the offense under the Selective Service Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 301 et seq. of failing, being a registrant, to notify his local board of a change in his address. There is also a sentence for the offense of failing to receive and fill out his questionnaire. Probation having been granted as to the sentence for the latter offense, the imprisonment is really for the former. The contentions, overruled by the District Judge and urged here, are that it is no offense against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartchy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bartchy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richard William Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. David B. TroutmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  3. Schultz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. SchaeferDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API