In Re Norse
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Per curiam
The petitioner has several times sought relief by way of habeas corpus from this Court. In common with a number of other petitioners, his stated grounds for justifying the issuance of the writ demonstrate a misunderstanding of the nature of the remedy.
This Court has frequently said that the writ is not a substitute, additional or concurrent method of appellate review. In re Rickert, 124 Vt. 232, 235-6, 203 A.2d 602. This means that questions raised by this petitioner concerning the admissibility of evidence, sufficiency of the evidence, credibility of witnesses, perjured testimony,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re DobsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- In Re MearsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- In re HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
- Walker v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lovejoy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
- Magoon v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- In re LovejoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988