Legal Opinion

In Re Norse

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 16, 1966No. 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner has several times sought relief by way of habeas corpus from this Court. In common with a number of other petitioners, his stated grounds for justifying the issuance of the writ demonstrate a misunderstanding of the nature of the remedy.

This Court has frequently said that the writ is not a substitute, additional or concurrent method of appellate review. In re Rickert, 124 Vt. 232, 235-6, 203 A.2d 602. This means that questions raised by this petitioner concerning the admissibility of evidence, sufficiency of the evidence, credibility of witnesses, perjured testimony,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re DobsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  2. In Re MearsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. In re HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896
  4. Walker v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re MosesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Magoon v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
  3. In re LovejoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API