Legal Opinion

Weigert-Dagen v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 12, 1950No. C. D. 1272PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

Each of these protests is directed against the assessment of duty by the collectors of customs at the ports of Laredo and St. Louis on “certain leather huaraches” at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1530 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 which read as follows:

Par. 1530. * * *

sic # * * * sji sf;(e) Boots, shoes, or other footwear (including athletic or sporting boots and shoes), made wholly or in chief value of leather, not specially provided for,. 20 per centum ad valorem; * * *.

The protest claim in each case is for duty at the rate of 10 per…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Haan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Fuchs Shoe Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. International Expediters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Mexican American Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API