Legal Opinion
Grenada Bank v. Seligman
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided October 3, 1932No. 30118PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
The appellee, L. Seligman, secured a judgment against the administratrix of the estate of D. A. Sinclair, deceased, which was duly enrolled. Upon this judgment, writs of garnishment were issued by which the Bank of Shaw, a branch of the Grenada Bank, and E. B. House were summoned to answer as garnishees. On the return day of these writs, the garnishees filed answers denying any indebtedness to the judgment debtor; denying that they had any effects of the judgment debtor in posses sion or under control; and denying that they knew or believed that any other person had effects of said judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Williams v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1868
- Gordin v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
- Thomas v. SturgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. EakinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- RW AIKEN INS. v. SevenOaks Capitol Corp.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2006
- Hunter v. Commercial Securities Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Mississippi, A Mutual Insurance Company v. Brown and Brown of Mississippi, LLCCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2022
- Home Bank, N.A. v. George Tarver Operating Co., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.