Legal Opinion

Pollard v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 5, 2004No. 30433-3-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Morgan, A.C.J.

In this workers’ compensation case, the question is whether the Department of Labor and Industries (DLI) may treat noise-related hearing loss not causally related to earlier noise-related hearing loss as a separate and distinct occupational disease. Answering yes, we affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the worker and DLI.

From 1961 to 2000, Scott Pollard worked for Weyer-haeuser as a log truck driver. He was routinely exposed to hazardous noise.

In the late 1970s, Pollard noticed that his hearing had declined. He saw a doctor, who diagnosed nerve damage in his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Boeing Co. v. HeidyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kilpatrick v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Seattle School District No. 1 v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Karniss v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harry v. Buse Timber & Sales, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Pollard v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Harry v. Buse Timber & Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Harry v. Buse Timber & Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. David White v. Centurylink Inc. And Department Of Labor And IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API