Legal Opinion
Vianello v. Pacifico
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 15, 1990No. 90-5038PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VAN DUSEN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Michael Vianello, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania denying his Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) motion to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. For the reasons which follow, we will reverse and remand to the district court for further consideration.
I
The relevant facts in this case are straightforward and uncontested. Plaintiff is a resident of Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania. On January 29, 1988, he brought the underlying 42. U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Cosmopolitan Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Consolidated Freightways Corporation Of Delaware v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Mennen Company v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- McGarr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- E. E. Benoist v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rains v. GardnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of Estate of WareMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Frank Amatangelo v. The Borough Of DonoraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Schmitt v. CapersMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Slavin Productions, Inc. v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.