Legal Opinion

Frost v. Thomas

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the Montgomery common pleas. Thomas sued Frost for an assault, battery and false imprisonment. The defendant attempted to justify as a special deputy in serving a warrant for larceny, issued by a justice of the peace. The plaintiff required the defendant to show him ^the warrant, before he would submit to the arrest, which the de- [ *"419 ] fendant not doing, the plaintiff resisted and the defendant beat Mm.

Read the full summary

Error from the Montgomery common pleas. Thomas sued Frost for an assault, battery and false imprisonment. The defendant attempted to justify as a special deputy in serving a warrant for larceny, issued by a justice of the peace. The plaintiff required the defendant to show him ^the warrant, before he would submit to the arrest, which the de- [ *"419 ] fendant not doing, the plaintiff resisted and the defendant beat Mm. The court charged the jury that if the defendant did not show the warrant to the plaintiff, he was a trespasser. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant…

1Opinion of the Court

The court held that a special deputy is hound to show his warrant if requested to do so, and if he omit, the party against whom the warrant is may resist an arrest, and the warrant under such circumstances is no protection against an action for an assault, battery and false imprisonment. See The People v. Hubbard, ante.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Comegys v. American Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bellows v. ShannonNew York Supreme Court · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API